Do women mostly see men as merely a MEANS TO AN END to escape the workforce themselves so they can live in more leisure than if they had to fend for themselves? Or marry into a certain lifestyle that they are either unable OR unwilling to provide for themselves, which also means having more free time and leisure to enjoy LIFE? Is this what women see men as? Well, a woman CANNOT do this unless there was a man to enable this slothlike behavior, otherwise she’d have to work.

Women realize how much money they can win for themselves through divorce, which started in the 1970’s. Or scheme their way into getting child support as a substitute to employment.

So, what this means, is that a woman (young women) can marry a RICH WELL TO DO MAN who works very hard, school and professionally, while she may be both unable and unwilling to earn that same amount of money herself. She prefers to only marry men who would let them stay at home, or give her a 80K lifestyle when she can only earn $10 an hour, which is less stress. Both scenarios would mean that the woman can live a stress-free lifestyle with the necessities of life PROVIDED for her when she doesn’t want to do it herself, much like the 1950’s model of working husband and stay-at-home wife.

But unlike the 1950’s stay-at-home wife, they could not have stolen alimony if she chose to file for divorce unilaterally, and it was impossible to get a divorce back then.

Not so however. Some women, usually stupid lazy women (but beautiful), elect to conform to this old-fashioned lifestyle because THEY HATE WORK and they enjoy living in a house they didn’t pay for. They are usually the same women who demand that a man pays for all of her dates, buys her a wedding ring for thousands of dollars, and pays for clothing from places like Saks Fifth Avenue and Tiffany’s, when she just works minimum wage. What is she offering on the table in exchange for the man paying for all her meals, food, rent, etc? Well we know. It’s something that men want the most, and value the most. Which make’s a woman’s life EASY since she does nothing but lay down.

It metastasizes into that she wants her ENTIRE LIFE AND BILLS paid for.

All because men have stronger sex drives then women do, and all because women are charging men for sex in another fashion then traditional in-call prostitution. But it’s prostitution by it’s definition, exchanging sex for goods, or in this case, exchanging sex for money (HER bills, her expenses).

How? Well, if she is young and beautiful, she shoots for higher, like the lawyer and CEO and the actuary, etc. And if she didn’t allow the man to have sex with her, he would stop paying for it and stop paying her bills and life expenses (food, rent for her free house). Waltzing in the American dream by a man, which is WHY WOMEN LIKE MONEY and why a poor man will have zero luck in the dating world.

Love is only to escape employment from the woman’s end. Or scale it her own employment dramatically.

We all HATE WORK. Society casts a blind eye to women who use their vagina & sex to escape the workforce. I mean, for what other reason can a woman marry up and a man can’t marry up? A man who cannot make it in the real world is homeless or starving, and a woman who is lazy and stupid (but young) is living the inverse of a man in the same position, that is living in relative luxury without working in a job (because a man is paying all the bills, while she just sits at home all day). While low-income men WORK and have a lesser quality of life than HOUSEWIVES WHO DON’T WORK AND LIVE IN LUXURY.

Men are going to say, DUH, of course this is so obvious. Well, if that’s so, NOT ONE woman will admit that this is her plan if it is that obvious. Would that effectively make “lazy women of leisure” prostitutes in disguise, with a stake in denying their own prostitution?

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website